I think I took a lot away from
hearing Angelo and Carson’s advice as well as from reading the “Survey Results”
handout they gave to us. At the same
time, though, some of the issues raised in both the talk and the reading made
me feel more anxious about whether my idea of what a Chat Café should be is
different from my group’s. In
particular, I am nervous that my attempts to be more of a peer than a teacher
and to have a freely flowing conversation rather than a strictly planned
activity don’t conform to my group’s expectations.
As I read the survey results, I
noticed that many students seemed to prefer a more structured topic or a
planned activity to a natural conversation.
Both times I have met with my group, I came with a prepared list of
conversation topics and an “emergency” deck of cards, but I haven’t had to use
any of them. My group and I sat outside
and chatted about majors and dining hall food and differences between their
home countries and the United States. I
enjoyed these casual conversations because they felt more like talking to a
group of friends than a classroom. Yet
many former participants wrote in their surveys that “follow[ing] a topic each
week would be better. Otherwise [they]
don’t really know what to talk about.”
Some of them suggested that the facilitator email the topic to the group
beforehand so that everyone could prepare to talk about it beforehand. I think this sounds a lot more like something
a teacher would do and I’m also a bit concerned that people might not feel
inclined to come if they aren’t particularly interested in the topic I’ve
chosen. One person said that taking
attendance is a good idea so that people feel obligated to be there, and while
I am definitely having trouble with attendance, I’m also not sure I want anyone
to feel obligated to be there. Other
students wrote that the facilitator “should be a teacher, not just a listener.” This confused me because we have spent a lot
of time in class talking about how we shouldn’t
be acting like a teacher. I’m also a
firm believer in the notion that the best way to get better at speaking a
language is simply by speaking it. I don’t
think that correcting every grammatical mistake will help them as much as
creating a space where everyone feels comfortable talking will. At the same time, though, I don’t want to
disappoint anyone who joined because they were looking for a structured environment
where someone would correct their mistakes.
Another person said that they felt
that ending exactly at the designated time made it seem like the facilitator
didn’t want to be there, but I know that some of the kids in my group have
class and meetings immediately after our Chat Café. I’m not really sure how to deal with this,
because I can see how it might seem rude to end exactly at 5:00, but it might also
be rude to keep people from their next activity.
All
this is a lot to think about, but I am confident we will all find our own ways
to respond to these conflicting pieces of advice and make our groups our
own. I think one of the best ways to do
this might be to send out a survey asking people what they are expecting from
this experience so that they can answer in a private and honest way. All in all, I’ve really enjoyed these first
two meetings and I’m looking forward to the rest of the semester!
Sofie -- I hope that the survey results and other information should decrease your anxiety, not increase it. I'm sorry if this information is making you more nervous. I think if you are getting a vibe from your group about what they need/want out of the group that is different from what you read in the surveys -- trust your group, not the surveys. There are many variations on a successful group, and no two groups are alike. Be flexible and trust your instincts. If you see your participants engaged each week in lively, casual discussion, you are doing it right. As for the question of tactfully ending on time, that might be worth discussing as a group -- bring it up in class!
ReplyDelete