I wrote a bit on what it's like to have less and less people show up in my last blog post, so I don't want to rehash the same maudlin sentiments. Though I am still disappointed by the lack of attendance and it has grown more embarrassing each week as I write emails that I know no one will respond to. It's frustrating and, unfortunately, sometimes pisses me off. I guess I finally know how my RA felt when her Harry Potter themed pumpkin carving invite emails fell on my deaf ears. But that's enough for self pity. At least I don't spend one hour every Friday sitting alone.
Last Friday, Sarah attended my Chat Cafe session. I was excited for two reasons. Firstly, my sessions would finally regain the shape of a Chat Cafe session, with more than two people talking to one another. And secondly, I was happy for Jesse (the lone remnant of that initial venture taken in late September) since he could finally interact with other students rather than just talk to me for an hour. When we all met at the Union, I could tell Jesse was excited just to have someone else to talk to. As Sarah can attest to, I didn't really have (and never really had) any guiding schedule or plans. I typically treat Jesse as I would a coworker I met with outside of work or a budding acquaintance. Sometimes, when I hear about some of the games and regimented activities that other students do during that sessions makes me wonder if that is perhaps the right approach. I was pretty critical of this sort of stuff in an earlier blog post, but now that I hear that the facilitators who use these methods don't have trouble with attendance to the degree I do. I know Scott told me not to get to critical and start blaming myself but I think looking and examining the manner in which I conduct these sessions is important. I'm going to bring cards to my next session and introduce Jesse (and whoever else shows up) to la Viuda. I learned the game in El Salvador but I think in the US it's called Whiskey Poker.
I love the first paragraph because it's so weird being the one who sends these invitational emails instead of receiving them! It feels like we're growing on up in this grown-up world!
ReplyDeleteAnd, yes, I'm agreeing with the fact that there wasn't a set structure to the chat, and I'm 100% sure you do not need it with Jesse. It is extremely unfortunate that you ended up with a bad group attendance rate, but don't take it to heart! After attending your chat cafe group, I'm positive it's not you. I think you were just unlucky.
Also, on the topic of just talking vs. games, I do think that "entertainment" is a huge factor of whether or not someone will dedicate time to it (i.e. showing up for an hour a week"), but that's not why I incorporate them to my circles. I mainly use them as icebreakers or when I feel a natural lull is coming into the conversation. (I hate silence. I know silence is often needed and natural, but I hate silence and awkward silence and ugh.) But, you're a better conversationalist than I am! So, it make sense to me that you don't rely on "conversation tricks" for your group dynamic... But, with that said, I'm glad you're bringing in Whiskey Poker to your group because, regardless of why games are used, fun is fun! :)
Alex, if you do try the card game, I look forward to hearing how it goes. I also think that turning the idea around could be wise -- to ask Jesse (and anyone else who comes) if they have card games they could teach you. One facilitator last year reported learning a Chinese card game called "Fighting the Landlord" which sounded pretty fun.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile I reiterate my call not to blame yourself for attendance issues -- there are many factors here beyond your control. And I've had facilitators in the past who've had exactly the opposite experience: for example, one facilitator regretted having done too much activity-based facilitation early on, and felt that such activities would have succeeded better if she'd given the group a chance to have more unguided conversations early in the semester. She felt her group only really clicked once she backed off on the games and events. So your approach hasn't been wrong.